Epsilon-Delta Proof: Limit Of (2x+5)/(√(x+1)+6) As X->3
by Dimemap Team56 views
Hey guys! Today, we're diving deep into the world of real analysis to tackle a classic problem: proving a limit using the rigorous epsilon-delta definition. Specifically, we want to show that
x→3limx+1+62x+5=811
Before we get started, let's break down what this actually means. The epsilon-delta definition is a way to make the intuitive idea of a limit precise. It basically says: "We can make the function's output as close as we want to the limit (11/8 in this case) by making the input x close enough to 3." "Close enough" is quantified by ϵ (how close the output is) and δ (how close the input x is to 3). Let's get into the details.
Understanding the Epsilon-Delta Definition
The ϵ-δ definition of a limit states that for every ϵ>0, there exists a δ>0 such that if 0<∣x−c∣<δ, then ∣f(x)−L∣<ϵ. In our case, c=3, f(x)=x+1+62x+5, and L=811.
So, our goal is to show that for any ϵ>0, we can find a δ>0 such that if 0<∣x−3∣<δ, then
x+1+62x+5−811<ϵ
The Strategy
The general strategy is to start with the expression ∣f(x)−L∣ and manipulate it algebraically until we can relate it to ∣x−c∣, which in our case is ∣x−3∣. Then, we can choose a δ that depends on ϵ to make the inequality ∣f(x)−L∣<ϵ hold.
It's like saying, "Okay, you want the output to be within ϵ of 11/8? No problem! I'll just make sure x is within δ of 3, where δ is this specific value I'm going to calculate based on ϵ."
The Proof
Let's start by manipulating the expression inside the absolute value:
Now, this looks a bit intimidating, but we can simplify it further. Notice that we want to relate this expression to ∣x−3∣. Let's try to factor something out that looks like (x−3). To do this, we need to do some algebraic trickery.
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of 16x−26−11x+1 which, regarding the square root term, is 16x−26+11x+1.
Now we have ∣x−3∣ nicely factored out. We need to bound the remaining expression. Since we're interested in x close to 3, let's assume that ∣x−3∣<1. This implies that 2<x<4.
Let's analyze the denominator:
x+1 is between 3≈1.73 and 5≈2.24, so x+1+6 is between roughly 7.73 and 8.24.
16x−26 is between 16(2)−26=6 and 16(4)−26=38.
11x+1 is between roughly 11(1.73)≈19.03 and 11(2.24)≈24.64.
So, 16x−26+11x+1 is between roughly 6+19.03=25.03 and 38+24.64=62.64.
Thus, the denominator 8(x+1+6)(16x−26+11x+1) is bounded below by approximately 8(7.73)(25.03)≈1548.
Now, let's look at the numerator ∣256x−185∣. Since 2<x<4, we have:
256x is between 256(2)=512 and 256(4)=1024.
So, 256x−185 is between 512−185=327 and 1024−185=839.
Thus, ∣256x−185∣ is bounded above by 839.
Therefore,
8(x+1+6)(16x−26+11x+1)256x−185<1548839<1
(A rough overestimate to simplify calculations. A more precise bound would work too).
Since we know that 8(x+1+6)(16x−26+11x+1)256x−185<1 (from our assumption that ∣x−3∣<1), we have:
∣x−3∣⋅8(x+1+6)(16x−26+11x+1)256x−185<∣x−3∣
So, if we choose δ=min(1,ϵ), then whenever 0<∣x−3∣<δ, we have ∣x−3∣<ϵ. Also, because we chose the minimum, we also have ∣x−3∣<1, satisfying our initial assumption used to bound the expression. Therefore, we have:
x+1+62x+5−811<∣x−3∣<ϵ
Conclusion
We have shown that for any ϵ>0, there exists a δ=min(1,ϵ) such that if 0<∣x−3∣<δ, then x+1+62x+5−811<ϵ. Therefore, by the ϵ-δ definition of a limit, we have proven that
x→3limx+1+62x+5=811
Woohoo! That was a tough one, but we made it through. The key is to carefully manipulate the expression, relate it to ∣x−c∣, and then find a suitable δ in terms of ϵ. Keep practicing, and you'll become an epsilon-delta master in no time!