M3 Staging Monitor Failure: Troubleshooting Guide

by ADMIN 50 views

Hey everyone, looks like we've got a M3 Staging Monitor Failure on our hands, specifically on October 13th, 2025, at 18:45:20 UTC. This is a good chance to learn how to tackle such problems. In this article, we will go through the problem thoroughly. It's crucial we understand what caused the failure and, more importantly, how to prevent it from happening again. Let's dive in and get this sorted out! This isn't just about fixing a bug; it's about building a more robust and reliable system. We'll start with the basics, then go deep into the specifics of the failure and how to fix it. We have to find out why the monitoring system failed and what steps we can take to prevent it from happening again. Are you ready to get started?

Understanding the Failure: What Happened?

The Core Issue: Failed Endpoint

The main problem is a failure of the M3 staging monitor, indicated by a failed endpoint. The failure was detected during a smoke test, which aims to quickly check key functionalities. The test run, identified as run #522, ran for a mere 0 seconds, suggesting an immediate failure, and it wasn't able to successfully test the endpoint.

The Timeline of Events

The incident occurred on October 13, 2025, at 18:45:20 UTC. The logs provide a snapshot of the events, specifically focusing on the API surface smoke tests. These tests are vital for ensuring the API's health and functionality. The logs show an attempt to test the POST /api/preview endpoint, which is designed to provide previews. The test returned a 200 status code, indicating the endpoint was reached. However, it failed to find the '.summary' field in the response. It is important to note that the absence of the .summary field means that the test failed, and that the data it expected was not received.

Decoding the Logs

The logs give us a detailed look into the issue. They show the testing of the POST /api/preview endpoint against the API base: https://cerply-api-staging-latest.onrender.com. The expected response should include a .summary field. The actual response, however, did not include this field. The returned JSON response includes data and meta fields. The data field has its own sections (summary, proposed_modules, clarifying_questions), but the test failed to find the expected .summary field. The meta data provides extra information, which includes source, canonized, and quality_score, giving us further context about the response.

The Investigation: Steps to Take

Action Items: A Checklist

  1. Review the Full Logs: Head over to the full logs to get a complete picture of what happened. This will allow us to gain a deep understanding of the events.
  2. Verify API Health: Check the staging API's health at https://cerply-api-staging-latest.onrender.com/api/health. This step is key to determine whether the API is operating as expected.
  3. Infrastructure Check: Examine the Render dashboard for any infrastructure problems. These could be the root cause.
  4. Workflow Re-run: If the issue appears temporary, re-running the workflow is a good start.
  5. Persistent Issue Investigation: If the problem persists, a deeper investigation is needed to fix the failed endpoint. This requires us to pinpoint the exact source of the error and address it.

Troubleshooting Techniques

When faced with this type of failure, there are several techniques we can use. First, we must go through the logs and pinpoint when the failure occurred. Secondly, check the API health and infrastructure status. Thirdly, if the issue is intermittent, the workflow could be restarted. If the issue remains, deep investigation is necessary. We should verify the endpoint's functionality and ensure that it is returning data as expected. The data should be properly formatted and meet all requirements.

Deep Dive into Solutions and Prevention

Root Cause Analysis

To find the root cause, let's start with the error message: Field not found. This means the .summary field was not present in the response. This could be due to a few causes:

  • Code Errors: There might be errors in the code that generates the response. Perhaps the logic that creates the .summary field is faulty, or it is not being populated correctly.
  • Data Issues: The data itself might be the problem. The data source for the .summary field could be unavailable or return incorrect data.
  • Configuration Problems: The API might be misconfigured. This might include environment variables, or other settings that impact the response.

Implementing a Fix

To fix the problem, we have to follow these steps:

  1. Examine the Code: Carefully look at the code associated with the /api/preview endpoint to verify how the .summary field is being generated. Check for any logic errors or data dependencies.
  2. Data Validation: Double-check the data sources and databases. Ensure that the necessary data is available and formatted correctly.
  3. Configuration Review: Go through the API's configurations and environment settings. Make sure that all is set up as expected, and that there are no configuration errors causing the issue.

Preventing Future Failures

To avoid these issues in the future, we should implement several measures:

  • Robust Testing: Use comprehensive tests that include the /api/preview endpoint, to find possible bugs. Consider setting up automated tests that run consistently, to detect any regressions early on.
  • Monitoring and Alerting: Improve your monitoring systems and set up alerts for failures. This helps the team to get notified promptly when issues arise.
  • Documentation: Make detailed documentation of the API and its endpoints, including expectations for the response data. Make sure that the documentation is complete, precise, and always up to date.

Related Resources

Reference Materials

We have some reference materials to assist us:

  • Epic: EPIC_M3_API_SURFACE.md. This is a higher-level document that describes the overall strategy.
  • Staging Report: STAGING_TEST_REPORT.md. This report has detailed information about the tests.
  • Smoke Script: api/scripts/smoke-m3.sh. This is the script that runs the smoke tests.

How to Use These Resources

  • Epic: Get a wider understanding of the project goals and the context in which the issue is occurring.
  • Staging Report: Find more details on the test results and failures. Analyze and understand what went wrong.
  • Smoke Script: Examine the tests that failed and find what caused the failure.

Conclusion

Alright, guys, we've covered the M3 Staging Monitor Failure, its causes, and how to fix it. Remember, this isn't just about fixing a bug; it's about creating a more reliable system. By reviewing the logs, checking the API's health, and going through the infrastructure, you can resolve the problem. Make sure to apply the solutions and prevent future failures by implementing better testing, monitoring, and documentation. Great job, and let's keep up the great work!